Threads hiding @pixelfed mentions, not a good look Meta 🙄
@dansup @pixelfed means they're afraid!
Have you noticed that fediverse talk gets absolutely no engagement on Threads despite Threads promising to integrate itself with it in the near future. I refuse to believe an average Joe is not interested in decentralization when average Threads commenter is so bent on politics.
Of course it's impossible to test algo timelines unfortunately so we'll never know.
@dansup Is Threads showing Fediverse replies at all yet? I didn't think they were. I thought they were only showing likes.
Wait
Wait
What?
But I thought Peter Cottle was all on about "federation" and https://fediforum.org/ just this very morning?
Here: https://www.threads.net/@pcottle
cc @pixelfed
Threads doesn't show replies, likes, or profiles from ANY other servers. Their roadmap for joining the fediverse, from the very start, was such that they'll start with one-way federation, and then, sometime later, make it two-way.
I've found a lot of flflakiness in activity pub comment threads between PeerTube and Mastodon alone, with each federated instance having random seeming replies and sub threads missing. Past behaviour may make malice an easy assumption, but for something like this with new software, bugginess or misguided implementation is much more likely.
