{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

tyil

@humanetech@mastodon.social @FreePietje@x0f.org @ArneBab@rollenspiel.social @blacklight@social.platypush.tech The site is the graphical UI, your terminal is the text-based UI. In the terminal you clone repos, write code, send/receive emails. does clearly promote using the tools that your OS comes with, rather than trying to shove everything in the graphical UI.

is efficient the moment you click an URL with a webchat. This is why it's great for communities. Compared to its supposed improvement, , it does a way better job for support chat. It loads in a second or less, handles well in extremely low bandwidth situations, and doesn't come with a convoluted means of simply dropping in a chat with a ridiculously simple protocol to interact with.

1
Share
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)

@tyil @blacklight @FreePietje @ArneBab

All agreed, yet all catering to the group of people who that appeals to most. And to many people it does not. It is an observation based on numbers.

Should we sniff our nose to those folks? Or try to connect different worlds, and be a larger, stronger group?

Once more I like to stress that I appreciate everyone's personal choice of tools. They are all valid choices.

Imho where we must focus is on bridging divides. Interop between tools is one way.

0
2y
Replies