{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@feditips

"...some are very tightly integrated..." [with Fediverse] while "...others are sort of one-directional...".

Exactly.

At this point, I'm not discussing (with, e.g., @matt) the deficiencies (or choices?) of individual pieces of software. I'm looking for info on this for many such pieces.

For me, your already excellent list "What other kinds of servers are on the Fediverse?" would be even more useful with "level of integration" info.

This is a suggestion. Your list, of course.

1
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
FediTips has moved!

@dj3ei @matt

I'm trying to keep the "basics" part of the site simple, while those who want more in-depth details about specific Fedi server types can look at the "beyond mastodon" section lower down the page.

Roughly speaking, the lower down the contents page you go the more complex the information.

I would definitely call these choices rather than deficiencies. The more features you add to software, the more resources it takes to maintain and design. Also, some developers might want to keep their software as focused as possible. I don't think PeerTube was ever meant to be for microblogging, for example.

0
2y
Replies