After some careful consideration, I have decided to block threads.net on pixelfed.social and .art by default

However, users will have the ability to unblock the domain

Soon we will be selectively enforcing authorized fetch for accounts with domain blocks so as to provide the best of both worlds.

(I'm also shipping a command for :pixelfed: admins to easily add user domain blocks for all local users)

I'm eager to hear your feedback!

PR: github.com/pixelfed/pixelfed/p

34
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
dansup

This will be rolling out shortly, I am wrapping up the PR and preparing to merge/deploy it to my servers!

0
11mo
0
11mo
Bèr Kessels 🐝 🚐 🏄 🌱

@dansup will you be reviewing your consideration when you have data?

E.g. the amount of your users that manually unblock. Or amount of interactions with threads? Or when you have a statistical significant amount of "reports" or "flags" over various domains, incl Threads?

2
11mo
Joshua Strobl :verified:

@dansup Glad you offer the ability to unblock it. I would certainly close my pixelfed account if it didn't.

0
11mo
Dan

@dansup Glad you are leaving us the option to unblock, thank you.

0
11mo
DavidB

@dansup@mastodon.social That's quite disappointing.
Glad we can unblock though, but it should be the other way around.

1
11mo
ꜰₐᵇₛᵉ 🇺🇦

@dansup User-level unblocks of admin-level blocks?

0
11mo

@dansup IMO that's actually a great way to protect the Fediverse while giving individuals the option. I didn't even realise it was possible to do it that way round

0
11mo
HCJ

@dansup I like the opt-out system for something as important as domain blocking, good work :mastodance:

0
11mo
Danie van der Merwe

@dansup I've always been pro-choice for users to block or not, but like some others I think it would have been better to have had the default as-is (open) and then users choose to block.Blocking on behalf of everyone seems to veer more towards censorship (my opinion). But OK choice is at least there. I'm keen ton reconnect again with my wife who is not on any alternative social networks.

0
11mo
Tokk :arch:

@dansup Default Blocking of big instances will slowly kill the fediverse. If big companies learn that they are not welcome they won't make efforts any more and let's be honest here: Most Users don't care and won't be in the fediverse in this case.

1
11mo
/@mateomaui@mastodon.social

@dansup looks like the most sane, least fanatical approach I’ve read yet

0
11mo

@dansup If I understood a word if it I might be alarmed?

0
11mo
Le Pertti

@dansup It should be the other way around, you don't need to decide for us what's blocked, so start with unblocked and then have it easy for us users to block what we want.

0
11mo
AndrewFelix 🐀🏴‍☠️ 🇵🇸

@dansup there are some amazing artists on threads. Personally I don’t think it’s a great idea, and it may limit potential growth.

1
11mo
Osma A

@dansup
Interesting, I haven't heard anyone else suggest using authorized fetch for only selected domains.

By combining authorized fetch and domain blocks, do you mean that
a) an account which has any domains blocked will enforce authorized fetch to all domains?
b) a domain which has been blocked by default will have authorized fetch enforced for all accounts?

or both, or something else?

0
11mo
Seriousity🐺

@dansup

even though I haven't use pixelfed, atleast they pick the right choice to block meta

0
11mo
0
11mo
Jon Tromans

@dansup Good to give folks a choice.

0
11mo
Esther Payne 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

@dansup thank you for doing this.

I think it's a very important part of the fediverse to have this attitude. To give an example of community based hosting with a focus on Freedom of association and Consent.

Yes Free speech is also important for our internet. But it can't come at the expense of harms to others.

1
11mo
Replies