{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@ArneBab @tyil @blacklight

First of all there's more likelihood they *read* along with things that are relevant to them. Though if you want their engagement a code forge tool alone is not enough. You have to facilitate for it.

Code forges, even the UI-heavy ones, are far from ideal to truly support this more diverse interaction.

But it is possible. For Humane Tech Community I had a workflow for a while where tech noobs learned to deal with issues assigned to them. UI being intuitive enough.

2
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)

@ArneBab @tyil @blacklight

Sourcehut caters to a subset of developers. Ones that love as minimalist as possible. Work themselves mostly in CLI's, vim and emacs.

It is fine. Everyone should choose the tool they like best. And with #ForgeFederation we might tie them together more seamlessly.

But in the choice you filter out others who might collaborate with you. Likely the same is true for UI-heavy choice, but this is where a majority of devs and other folks have their preference I think.

1
2y
Arne Babenhauserheide

@humanetech So it needs a better UX? Could that be done with the simple structure of hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/dryads-wake ?

Being fast is part of good UX. What is missing? @tyil @blacklight

1
2y
Replies