Simple Social Network

{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

Dan Killam

2y ·
Public

·
fediscience.org

@VictorVenema @RARohde @icesheetmike @FrankSonntag @steve I think most of the people weren't upset about the signup page, but instead the followup email, which makes it sound like a peer reviewed pub in the last 5 years is a hard requirement, when it seems from your policy that isn't the case. So you might add a sentence to that email that other forms of participation qualify.

Victor Venema

@dantheclamman Yes, the email was poorly worded. Before we would write individual requests for more information and could write more specifically which information was missing.

As such emails go to people who basically ignored the request for information on the sign-up page they are formulated a bit more strongly. A signup just wrote they had one publication in 1981.

As this mail went to many we had to cover many bases and wanted to avoid being flooded with many vague replies.

@FrankSonntag