{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@humanetech

On the other hand, lots of designers don't contribute, or fail because, and I say these with respect to (most :smile:) designers:

- they don't understand Free and Open Source Software philiopsophy
- think they are the most important person on the project
- aren't willing to be part of the commiunity and learn
- can't/dont want to understand the users are vocal
- equate it (all) with for profit software
- find distributed decision making difficult

@ArneBab @tyil @blacklight

3
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)

@bernat @ArneBab @tyil @blacklight

Yes, these are also my observations. It is a complicated socio-cultural gap to be bridged.

I'll make mention of your toots on our discuss.coding.social forum, thank you!

1
2y
Arne Babenhauserheide

@bernat I think one part is missing: In a company, UX says “needs to be changed” and the devs realize this. In a Free Software project, there are no paid devs and the devs that are there all have their own plans. To make it easy to contribute, the project must be structured in a way that UX people can make their changes themselves. @humanetech @tyil @blacklight

1
2y
Lien Rag

@bernat

Isn't there a real problem of design decisions not being atomic ?

@humanetech @ArneBab @tyil @blacklight

1
2y
Replies