{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@darius @charlesrandall

*Is* it hard? I think the original author's server just refuses to add certain, or all, replies to the replies collection.

Remote servers can still generate replies, although the better-behaved ones won't, but any replies generated won't be compiled on the original post.

2
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Darius Kazemi

@evan @charlesrandall if you want to make it literally not possible in the UI of a remote server for someone to reply, that is hard

But you're right, you could simply neither advertise replies nor render them to the author - again though that is more like a mute than a permission model (I like it though!). The Twitter model is a permission one

1
2y
Erin

@evan @darius @charlesrandall note that origin servers have no control over what other servers show as a reply to a post in the protocol as-implemented today

i.e. when you view a post, the things that show up as replies are any messages that someone declared as inReplyTo that post that your server knows about

1
2y
Replies