{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@humanetech I’m not sure how they get involved. Do they use the issue-tracker? Do they subscribe to updates? Do they file pull-requests?

Do you have information how less technical folks get involved? @tyil @blacklight

I like sr.ht, because it supports Mercurial (hg.sr.ht) and provides what I need: my code available somewhere.

The only thing I miss: I’d like to have an export from the README.org as part of the landing page.

1
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)

@ArneBab @tyil @blacklight

First of all there's more likelihood they *read* along with things that are relevant to them. Though if you want their engagement a code forge tool alone is not enough. You have to facilitate for it.

Code forges, even the UI-heavy ones, are far from ideal to truly support this more diverse interaction.

But it is possible. For Humane Tech Community I had a workflow for a while where tech noobs learned to deal with issues assigned to them. UI being intuitive enough.

2
2y
Replies