{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

It feels like in large parts is congruent with what the fediverse has to offer, but is different for the sake of being different. I also think that it’s hard to judge a protocol without a real world application. There are some design choices in that make me feel like they might be awkward to implement in practice.

4
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin

@Gargron it would be awesome if you could implement post migration to remove the biggest concern that people have of activitypub

0
2y
marius

@Gargron someone on HN pointed out Solid from Tim Berner Lee, and I see a better chance for interoperability there because it uses ActivityStreams as an foundational ontology. I remember hearing about it when it launched, but they seem to have made good progress (at least documentation wise).

solidproject.org/developers/vo

0
2y
Shaul_Nakamovich

@Gargron

I would believe, if AT is gonna be open, one could try to implement both in parallel if You got enough resources ,and do A/B benchmarks kind of. But up to You.

Big upside is, they weakened monopoly over algorithm, and they feel threat from distribution and migration between suppliers.

I also believe, distribution will allow them to separate both geographic bubbles probably between countries plus one horizontally within country. I think thats the biggest take of theirs, and thats why.one of my alter egos was pushing for hate it of live it, you know what kind of speech.

Hate me now, but lack of strong moderation, takes away liability for harm by content. See 230.

0
2y
Eugen Rochko

I can't help but feel cynical about the incentives here. If your team receives $13M in funding, are you going to assess existing ecosystems and conclude that other people are already doing adequate work and there's not much for you to do there? #Bluesky #ATP

4
2y
Replies