{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

I've made a deliberate choice against a quoting feature because it inevitably adds toxicity to people's behaviours. You are tempted to quote when you should be replying, and so you speak at your audience instead of with the person you are talking to. It becomes performative. Even when doing it for "good" like ridiculing awful comments, you are giving awful comments more eyeballs that way. No quote toots. Thank's

297
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Imprint

@Gargron I LOVE it. Thank you for being so thoughtful

0
2y
s427

@Gargron it's interesting because if this was on Twitter, my first reflex would to quote your post and add something like "that's an interesting take, what do you guys think?". Not all commentary need to be toxic, although I definitely see where you're coming from. QRT can be a way to redirect the discussion toward your community, so I will definitely miss this feature a bit.

0
2y
0
2y
Free Bear

@Gargron Right choice.

0
2y
Gert Jan C. Veenstra

@Gargron
Quoting is also a way to start a new thread

0
2y
Carl Heath

@Gargron what a great explanation. Thank you!

0
2y
Richard

@Gargron I totally agree, thanks for the consistant explanation

0
2y
Adam

@Gargron Good decision! Agree! I like that the instance I'm on doesn't even have DMs which means less private toxicity, too.

0
2y
Abeni

@Gargron I was just thinking about the lack of QT here last night and it makes so much sense.

0
2y
Dr Annette Jorgensen

@Gargron But.. I’d love to say something POSITIVE about the posts I share… explain why I like them and why I think they’re important? One of the best things about the birdysite?

0
2y
Onagrine-Esperanto

@Gargron often I use both for the same tweet.
But I suppose I am not very "toxic"

0
2y
Jérémie Lumbroso

@Gargron At the same time, the programmer soul in me that's a bit Libertarian thinks "Why the heck?!", but the empath sees the wisdom of what you are saying. I think I have rarely seen quoting used as a mechanism to constructively continue a conversation, now that I think about it. 🤨 Most often as a tool to decontextualize speech. 🤮 Smart! 👏🏻

0
2y
Jennifer Canesten

@Gargron disappointed to see that this place already has the tone police!

0
2y
Mark Ambler

@Gargron A wise move.

0
2y
Arnon

@Gargron I’m not certain I agree with the idea that it will, of necessity, lead to toxicity, but I’m new here, and must admit to ignorance of other ways to do things. Ie. I could be blisteringly wrongheaded. In any event, happy to learn a different way to do things that has obviously been working for hundreds of thousands of people for years now.

0
2y
ipofanes

@Gargron I think this is a wise choice.

0
2y
Mekka 💉💉💉🎉

@Gargron

Every time I find Mastodon "missing" a common Twitter feature I ask myself if this feature is really missing, or if I'm trying to bring something to Mastodon that the curators and shapers of Mastodon culture explicitly don't want here.

This one is an opinionated position, and... I think I like it?

Hand rolling a QRT is not impossible here, but a lot of friction is added, and "healthier conversation" alternatives are easier to do. I'm going to "reply and boost" this!

0
2y
0
2y
Bianca de Haan

@Gargron That actually makes a fair amount of sense… It‘s making me reconsider my Twitter behaviour. I mostly quote-tweeted to „add value“ I suppose, & add my own perspective to the debate, as opposed to simply re-tweeting

0
2y
TiffyToes

@Gargron AMAZING 🤩 I love that, thank you!!!!

0
2y
Replies