{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

I've made a deliberate choice against a quoting feature because it inevitably adds toxicity to people's behaviours. You are tempted to quote when you should be replying, and so you speak at your audience instead of with the person you are talking to. It becomes performative. Even when doing it for "good" like ridiculing awful comments, you are giving awful comments more eyeballs that way. No quote toots. Thank's

297
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Jake Hamby

@Gargron that's very smart. Thanks for explaining.

0
2y
Elizabeth Knox

@Gargron but quoting does work well if it’s a thread being amplified

0
2y
David Durant

@Gargron This is fascinating. I'm a big fan of quoting personally but I can fully understand why you've chosen not to include it. I wonder, with Mastodon being open source, whether we'll end up with a fork with someone implementing quoting as it's so popular. Potential compatibility across federated instances of forked versions may lead to interesting times.

0
2y
Rajiv Pant

@Gargron I hear you. You make a reasonable point.

0
2y
Cliff

@Gargron Thank you for making this choice. This is why I find Mastodon so refreshing 👍

0
2y
Kevin Gamin

@Gargron This gave me a different perspective on how to interact here, including this reply. Thank you.

0
2y
Rua M. Williams

@Gargron but that's my emotional support toxic behavior 😩

0
2y
'|

@Gargron BTW, thank you for this!

0
2y
MmeSazerat

@Gargron
I love toots. Authentic. No birds harmed.

0
2y
Manish Vij

@Gargron My audience has context, there’s a long history of shared humor. Replies only have local context.

0
2y
Eubie Drew 𓅪𐃘𓃰

@Gargron ooooooo... I want to quote toot this so bad!

0
2y
Annalee

@Gargron this reasoning makes sense to me - I miss it because I often use quote tweets to "yes, and," as in "this thread is good and I want to jump of it to talk about something related but I don't want to clog up the author's mentions or crowd their mic." But linking can still be used for that the same way I'd link to an article etc

0
2y
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

@Gargron Some people are toxic that way, it's true. But seeing that is often just a good way to spot a toxic person. Limiting otherwise valuable functionality isn't such a great way to restrict toxicity as implementing quality of life features like block, mute, the ability to leave conversations etc. Most of the time a straightforward retoot should be enough, mind.

0
2y
Reuben Bidez

@Gargron this is so thoughtful and progressive. Makes total sense to me.

0
2y
Kaz is now making music?

@Gargron THANK YOU. Hard agree.

0
2y
Alex Francis

@Gargron this is something I like very much. I like that the system encourages talking to (tooting to) the author of a toot, not talking about them to some anonymous audience. Which I didn’t even realize I did so much. Thank you.

0
2y
0
2y
Kristin Henry

@Gargron Thinking about it, and your reasons...I think you are right. And I thank you.

For me, I used the quote-tweet do amplify and emphasize issues I face as a woman in tech+art+science. But we can all find other ways to amplify/boost in more healthy ways.

The challenge for me, sometimes, is that it's hard to form words to explain why something really resonates for me. And that is what I used quote-tweet for. With my comment being "This!"

0
2y
Kristin Henry

@Gargron Thinking about it, and your reasons...I think you are right. And I thank you.

For me, I used the quote-tweet to amplify and emphasize issues I face as a woman in tech+art+science. But we can all find other ways to amplify/boost in more healthy ways.

The challenge for me, sometimes, is that it's hard to form words to explain why something really resonates for me. And that is what I used quote-tweet for. With my comment being "This!"

0
2y

@Gargron Right decision. 👍

0
2y
Replies