Dave Copeland :ruby:'s latest activity
- 3mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
@nateberkopec I create a bind mount to my local disk of the entire git checkout. This works well. On macOS, this can be slower than direct disk access but it's gotten faster and it doesn't bother me, especially with the simplicity of the setup (I have also had success with NFS mounts).
In both cases, all tools for auto-doing-stuff must support filesystem polling. Most seem to?
…See more
@nateberkopec I create a bind mount to my local disk of the entire git checkout. This works well. On macOS, this can be slower than direct disk access but it's gotten faster and it doesn't bother me, especially with the simplicity of the setup (I have also had success with NFS mounts).
In both cases, all tools for auto-doing-stuff must support filesystem polling. Most seem to?
See less
@nateberkopec I create a bind mount to my local disk of the entire git checkout. This works well. On macOS, this can be slower than direct disk access but it's gotten faster and it doesn't bother me, especially with the simplicity of the setup (I have also had success with NFS mounts).
In both cases, all tools for auto-doing-stuff must support filesystem polling. Most seem to?
@nateberkopec I create a bind mount to my local disk of the entire git checkout. This works well. On macOS, this can be slower than direct disk access but it's gotten faster and it doesn't bother me, especially with the simplicity of the setup (I have also had success with NFS mounts).
In both cases, all tools for auto-doing-stuff must support filesystem polling. Most seem to?
…See more
See less
- 5mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
@noelrap Wow! I went to HS with a guy that has written a lot of mediocre blockbusters, and I think I would be far more envious if he wrote ANY Star Trek, much less those particular episodes
…See more
@noelrap Wow! I went to HS with a guy that has written a lot of mediocre blockbusters, and I think I would be far more envious if he wrote ANY Star Trek, much less those particular episodes
See less
@noelrap Wow! I went to HS with a guy that has written a lot of mediocre blockbusters, and I think I would be far more envious if he wrote ANY Star Trek, much less those particular episodes
@noelrap Wow! I went to HS with a guy that has written a lot of mediocre blockbusters, and I think I would be far more envious if he wrote ANY Star Trek, much less those particular episodes
- 5mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
@noelrap Ha, Prodigy is exactly Star Wars but it's Star Trek (I love it and pray for its return).
I think the Star Trek shows in the "new era" aren't all great, but they've leaned into nostalgia and have produce much higher quality shows than Star Wars/Disney has.
SNW is a reminder that episode of the week styles can be awesome and still build characters without complicated storylines.
…See more
@noelrap Ha, Prodigy is exactly Star Wars but it's Star Trek (I love it and pray for its return).
I think the Star Trek shows in the "new era" aren't all great, but they've leaned into nostalgia and have produce much higher quality shows than Star Wars/Disney has.
SNW is a reminder that episode of the week styles can be awesome and still build characters without complicated storylines.
See less
@noelrap Ha, Prodigy is exactly Star Wars but it's Star Trek (I love it and pray for its return).
I think the Star Trek shows in the "new era" aren't all great, but they've leaned into nostalgia and have produce much higher quality shows than Star Wars/Disney has.
SNW is a reminder that episode of the week styles can be awesome and still build characters without complicated storylines.
@noelrap Ha, Prodigy is exactly Star Wars but it's Star Trek (I love it and pray for its return).
I think the Star Trek shows in the "new era" aren't all great, but they've leaned into nostalgia and have produce much higher quality shows than Star Wars/Disney has.
SNW is a reminder that episode of the week styles can be awesome and still build characters without complicated storylines.
- 5mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
Saga #67 coming on July 31!!!!!
This is the only comic I still subscribe to/read. I'm sure there are other good ones, but it’s kind of a lot to figure out which ones I can jump into and I just have lost patience for a lot of the DC/Marvel superhero stuff. But Saga is awesome!
…See more
Saga #67 coming on July 31!!!!!
This is the only comic I still subscribe to/read. I'm sure there are other good ones, but it’s kind of a lot to figure out which ones I can jump into and I just have lost patience for a lot of the DC/Marvel superhero stuff. But Saga is awesome!
See less
Saga #67 coming on July 31!!!!!
This is the only comic I still subscribe to/read. I'm sure there are other good ones, but it’s kind of a lot to figure out which ones I can jump into and I just have lost patience for a lot of the DC/Marvel superhero stuff. But Saga is awesome!
Saga #67 coming on July 31!!!!!
This is the only comic I still subscribe to/read. I'm sure there are other good ones, but it’s kind of a lot to figure out which ones I can jump into and I just have lost patience for a lot of the DC/Marvel superhero stuff. But Saga is awesome!
- 5mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
I don't get why Disney doesn't just do Star Wars versions of other normal shows. That’s maybe not very creative, but the results would be so much better than what they have produced.
• Law & Order but it's Star Wars
• The A Team, but it's Star Wars
• Star Trek, but it's Star Wars
• A Western but it's Star Wars (THEY DID THIS AND IT’S THE ONLY GOOD ONE)
Instead we get “2-part episode from the 3rd season of a show you haven't watched, but stretched to 10 episodes and there are lightsabers”
…See more
I don't get why Disney doesn't just do Star Wars versions of other normal shows. That’s maybe not very creative, but the results would be so much better than what they have produced.
• Law & Order but it's Star Wars
• The A Team, but it's Star Wars
• Star Trek, but it's Star Wars
• A Western but it's Star Wars (THEY DID THIS AND IT’S THE ONLY GOOD ONE)
Instead we get “2-part episode from the 3rd season of a show you haven't watched, but stretched to 10 episodes and there are lightsabers”
See less
I don't get why Disney doesn't just do Star Wars versions of other normal shows. That’s maybe not very creative, but the results would be so much better than what they have produced.
• Law & Order but it's Star Wars
• The A Team, but it's Star Wars
• Star Trek, but it's Star Wars
• A Western but it's Star Wars (THEY DID THIS AND IT’S THE ONLY GOOD ONE)
Instead we get “2-part episode from the 3rd season of a show you haven't watched, but stretched to 10 episodes and there are lightsabers”
I don't get why Disney doesn't just do Star Wars versions of other normal shows. That’s maybe not very creative, but the results would be so much better than what they have produced.
• Law & Order but it's Star Wars
• The A Team, but it's Star Wars
• Star Trek, but it's Star Wars
• A Western but it's Star Wars (THEY DID THIS AND IT’S THE ONLY GOOD ONE)
Instead we get “2-part episode from the 3rd season of a show you haven't watched, but stretched to 10 episodes and there are lightsabers”
- 5mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
- 5mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
@noelrap Ah, I guess that makes more sense, though I am definitely Team Editor Stop Bothering Me Until I Ask For Something so I would probably never notice these sorts of things?
…See more
@noelrap Ah, I guess that makes more sense, though I am definitely Team Editor Stop Bothering Me Until I Ask For Something so I would probably never notice these sorts of things?
See less
@noelrap Ah, I guess that makes more sense, though I am definitely Team Editor Stop Bothering Me Until I Ask For Something so I would probably never notice these sorts of things?
@noelrap Ah, I guess that makes more sense, though I am definitely Team Editor Stop Bothering Me Until I Ask For Something so I would probably never notice these sorts of things?
- 5mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
@noelrap That's interesting. I feel like anyone that says that has never ran a compiler before :)
I did a project in Go one time and it's famous for having a fast compiler (I guess). It was the slowest most god-awful feedback loop. I feel like "fast for a compiler" is not the same as "fast”.
…See more
@noelrap That's interesting. I feel like anyone that says that has never ran a compiler before :)
I did a project in Go one time and it's famous for having a fast compiler (I guess). It was the slowest most god-awful feedback loop. I feel like "fast for a compiler" is not the same as "fast”.
See less
@noelrap That's interesting. I feel like anyone that says that has never ran a compiler before :)
I did a project in Go one time and it's famous for having a fast compiler (I guess). It was the slowest most god-awful feedback loop. I feel like "fast for a compiler" is not the same as "fast”.
@noelrap That's interesting. I feel like anyone that says that has never ran a compiler before :)
I did a project in Go one time and it's famous for having a fast compiler (I guess). It was the slowest most god-awful feedback loop. I feel like "fast for a compiler" is not the same as "fast”.
- 6mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
- 6mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
Two OO ways to design something, curious what everyone's thoughts are? This is w/out context of a framework, just purely OO perspective.
Option 1 - Stateless object w/ Rich Result
Option 2 - Stateful object (e.g. command pattern + internal state to store results)
https://gist.github.com/davetron5000/19aa850df641be6c334e9b64a944b6c8
My thoughts follow, but I am not sure which is the "best" pattern - again all things being equal/not in Rails/etc.
…See more
Two OO ways to design something, curious what everyone's thoughts are? This is w/out context of a framework, just purely OO perspective.
Option 1 - Stateless object w/ Rich Result
Option 2 - Stateful object (e.g. command pattern + internal state to store results)
https://gist.github.com/davetron5000/19aa850df641be6c334e9b64a944b6c8
My thoughts follow, but I am not sure which is the "best" pattern - again all things being equal/not in Rails/etc.
See less
Two OO ways to design something, curious what everyone's thoughts are? This is w/out context of a framework, just purely OO perspective.
Option 1 - Stateless object w/ Rich Result
Option 2 - Stateful object (e.g. command pattern + internal state to store results)
https://gist.github.com/davetron5000/19aa850df641be6c334e9b64a944b6c8
My thoughts follow, but I am not sure which is the "best" pattern - again all things being equal/not in Rails/etc.
Two OO ways to design something, curious what everyone's thoughts are? This is w/out context of a framework, just purely OO perspective.
Option 1 - Stateless object w/ Rich Result
Option 2 - Stateful object (e.g. command pattern + internal state to store results)
https://gist.github.com/davetron5000/19aa850df641be6c334e9b64a944b6c8
My thoughts follow, but I am not sure which is the "best" pattern - again all things being equal/not in Rails/etc.
- 6mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
Star Trek Discovery Series Thoughts
This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal
@noelrap Yeah, I remember some Paramount+ sizzle reel saying that discovery was "bringing theatrical production values" or something and…I guess it did? That's not what star trek has been missing IMO.
…See more
@noelrap Yeah, I remember some Paramount+ sizzle reel saying that discovery was "bringing theatrical production values" or something and…I guess it did? That's not what star trek has been missing IMO.
See less
@noelrap Yeah, I remember some Paramount+ sizzle reel saying that discovery was "bringing theatrical production values" or something and…I guess it did? That's not what star trek has been missing IMO.
@noelrap Yeah, I remember some Paramount+ sizzle reel saying that discovery was "bringing theatrical production values" or something and…I guess it did? That's not what star trek has been missing IMO.
- 6mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
Today I ordered an espresso. Person at the counter had no idea what that was. I pointed to the menu figuring that would help. After debate with a co-worker I was given a latte.
What did they think the latte is made from?
I’m gonna be that old man asking for “the black stuff that comes out that you add to the milk. Yes just that black stuff.”
…See more
Today I ordered an espresso. Person at the counter had no idea what that was. I pointed to the menu figuring that would help. After debate with a co-worker I was given a latte.
What did they think the latte is made from?
I’m gonna be that old man asking for “the black stuff that comes out that you add to the milk. Yes just that black stuff.”
See less
Today I ordered an espresso. Person at the counter had no idea what that was. I pointed to the menu figuring that would help. After debate with a co-worker I was given a latte.
What did they think the latte is made from?
I’m gonna be that old man asking for “the black stuff that comes out that you add to the milk. Yes just that black stuff.”
Today I ordered an espresso. Person at the counter had no idea what that was. I pointed to the menu figuring that would help. After debate with a co-worker I was given a latte.
What did they think the latte is made from?
I’m gonna be that old man asking for “the black stuff that comes out that you add to the milk. Yes just that black stuff.”
- 6mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
Star Trek Discovery Series Thoughts
This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal
I didn't love the series finale, and even though it was supposed to be only a season finale, it didn't work for me. It made the entire season feel absolutely pointless. I never was interested in the Michael/Book romance. And, while I found the Gray/Adira plots really boring, those two got a terrible resolution. It just sorta happened. Would've been better to start them off apart and the chance meeting gets them together.
Anyway, my thoughts on the series:
…See more
I didn't love the series finale, and even though it was supposed to be only a season finale, it didn't work for me. It made the entire season feel absolutely pointless. I never was interested in the Michael/Book romance. And, while I found the Gray/Adira plots really boring, those two got a terrible resolution. It just sorta happened. Would've been better to start them off apart and the chance meeting gets them together.
Anyway, my thoughts on the series:
See less
I didn't love the series finale, and even though it was supposed to be only a season finale, it didn't work for me. It made the entire season feel absolutely pointless. I never was interested in the Michael/Book romance. And, while I found the Gray/Adira plots really boring, those two got a terrible resolution. It just sorta happened. Would've been better to start them off apart and the chance meeting gets them together.
Anyway, my thoughts on the series:
I didn't love the series finale, and even though it was supposed to be only a season finale, it didn't work for me. It made the entire season feel absolutely pointless. I never was interested in the Michael/Book romance. And, while I found the Gray/Adira plots really boring, those two got a terrible resolution. It just sorta happened. Would've been better to start them off apart and the chance meeting gets them together.
Anyway, my thoughts on the series:
- 7mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
@noelrap @getajobmike I wonder if the book's build system supplied an empty stdin?
…See more
@noelrap @getajobmike I wonder if the book's build system supplied an empty stdin?
See less
@noelrap @getajobmike I wonder if the book's build system supplied an empty stdin?
@noelrap @getajobmike I wonder if the book's build system supplied an empty stdin?
…See more
See less
- 7mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
I was reading Pickaxe to learn more about the CGI library. The code on page 329 (as well as example code in Ruby docs) doesn't seem to work - it wants to be given something on standard input.
https://gist.github.com/davetron5000/8c84b2a6770be87c6752f1c4f775f7ad
/cc @noelrap
…See more
I was reading Pickaxe to learn more about the CGI library. The code on page 329 (as well as example code in Ruby docs) doesn't seem to work - it wants to be given something on standard input.
https://gist.github.com/davetron5000/8c84b2a6770be87c6752f1c4f775f7ad
/cc @noelrap
See less
I was reading Pickaxe to learn more about the CGI library. The code on page 329 (as well as example code in Ruby docs) doesn't seem to work - it wants to be given something on standard input.
https://gist.github.com/davetron5000/8c84b2a6770be87c6752f1c4f775f7ad
/cc @noelrap
I was reading Pickaxe to learn more about the CGI library. The code on page 329 (as well as example code in Ruby docs) doesn't seem to work - it wants to be given something on standard input.
https://gist.github.com/davetron5000/8c84b2a6770be87c6752f1c4f775f7ad
/cc @noelrap
- 7mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
#TIL about Ruby:
String === String # => false
Meaning:
x = String
result = case x
when String then "got a string"
else “not a string"
end
result # => not a string
I guess I figured === would always be true for equality, but I guess not?
Of note, "foo" === "foo” # => true
Weird.
…See more
#TIL about Ruby:
String === String # => false
Meaning:
x = String
result = case x
when String then "got a string"
else “not a string"
end
result # => not a string
I guess I figured === would always be true for equality, but I guess not?
Of note, "foo" === "foo” # => true
Weird.
See less
#TIL about Ruby:
String === String # => false
Meaning:
x = String
result = case x
when String then "got a string"
else “not a string"
end
result # => not a string
I guess I figured === would always be true for equality, but I guess not?
Of note, "foo" === "foo” # => true
Weird.
#TIL about Ruby:
String === String # => false
Meaning:
x = String
result = case x
when String then "got a string"
else “not a string"
end
result # => not a string
I guess I figured === would always be true for equality, but I guess not?
Of note, "foo" === "foo” # => true
Weird.
- 10mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
- 10mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
- 10mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
- 11mo ·
-
Public·
-
ruby.social
@noelrap @soulcutter I can totally appreciate—and believe—that is what happens. Their devs' talks are usually good, so it makes sense. But I think this is all the more reason to try to find a way to solicit talks without compromising the other principles of the org
…See more
@noelrap @soulcutter I can totally appreciate—and believe—that is what happens. Their devs' talks are usually good, so it makes sense. But I think this is all the more reason to try to find a way to solicit talks without compromising the other principles of the org
See less
@noelrap @soulcutter I can totally appreciate—and believe—that is what happens. Their devs' talks are usually good, so it makes sense. But I think this is all the more reason to try to find a way to solicit talks without compromising the other principles of the org
@noelrap @soulcutter I can totally appreciate—and believe—that is what happens. Their devs' talks are usually good, so it makes sense. But I think this is all the more reason to try to find a way to solicit talks without compromising the other principles of the org