Ms. Penny šŸ Oaken's latest activity

It had to be done and I refuse to apologise for it (CW: Suggestive Innuendo, Punnery)

This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal

@darius I donā€™t subscribe to Freud but sometimes a subtext just screams out

0
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin

{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@Gargron Constructive criticism of moderation process (to help improve):

Any moderation action that will result in the suspension of a user account should be subject to a ā€œtwo-personā€ approval - that two people with mod privileges approve a suspension.
The second person should be encouraged to be adversarial to the motion to suspend the user - ā€œdevilā€™s advocateā€ - and have the ability to escalate to a third person (one with executive agency) to tiebreak / document / improve the process.

0
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin

fedi meta, probably just ignore this

This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal

@darius IANAL IANYL ATINLA; the approach some friends decided upon for their policy was ā€œ[X] is not intended to be a marketplace; Certain transactions as prohibited by applicable US & [local] law are forbidden & will result in account permanent suspensionā€.

That way they could claim to be agnostic of any sales happening while avoiding liability under various US laws covering narcotics, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, finance instruments, etc

0
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin

It had to be done and I refuse to apologise for it (CW: Suggestive Innuendo, Punnery)

This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal
1
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Replies