Amy (she/her)'s latest activity
- 2y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.party
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@Gargron I appreciate you and your team listening to the discussion and reconsidering your position. I hope you'll be able to implement the multi-level permissions that have been suggested — not just on or off, but the ability to limit QT to followers, followed, and/or mutuals would be greatly appreciated as well, but if that's too difficult, just a simple on-off setting would be better than nothing.
…See more
@Gargron I appreciate you and your team listening to the discussion and reconsidering your position. I hope you'll be able to implement the multi-level permissions that have been suggested — not just on or off, but the ability to limit QT to followers, followed, and/or mutuals would be greatly appreciated as well, but if that's too difficult, just a simple on-off setting would be better than nothing.
See less
@Gargron I appreciate you and your team listening to the discussion and reconsidering your position. I hope you'll be able to implement the multi-level permissions that have been suggested — not just on or off, but the ability to limit QT to followers, followed, and/or mutuals would be greatly appreciated as well, but if that's too difficult, just a simple on-off setting would be better than nothing.
@Gargron I appreciate you and your team listening to the discussion and reconsidering your position. I hope you'll be able to implement the multi-level permissions that have been suggested — not just on or off, but the ability to limit QT to followers, followed, and/or mutuals would be greatly appreciated as well, but if that's too difficult, just a simple on-off setting would be better than nothing.
- 2y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.party
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
- 2y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.party
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@Gargron have you or your moderation team reached out to the instances saying they plan to defederate from you soon, and worked out what needs to happen to stop that?
I worry that something like this child spiral out of control and fracture the mastodon part of the fediverse.
…See more
@Gargron have you or your moderation team reached out to the instances saying they plan to defederate from you soon, and worked out what needs to happen to stop that?
I worry that something like this child spiral out of control and fracture the mastodon part of the fediverse.
See less
@Gargron have you or your moderation team reached out to the instances saying they plan to defederate from you soon, and worked out what needs to happen to stop that?
I worry that something like this child spiral out of control and fracture the mastodon part of the fediverse.
@Gargron have you or your moderation team reached out to the instances saying they plan to defederate from you soon, and worked out what needs to happen to stop that?
I worry that something like this child spiral out of control and fracture the mastodon part of the fediverse.
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.party
On NDAs and talking to the enemy
This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal
@darius This is exactly why I don't get people being doom and gloom about the NDA meeting.
Do I trust Meta? hell no. But knowing what they're up to, and being able to do something about it—even if you can't talk about it directly—is valuable AF.
It is precisely because we don't trust them that we need skeptics in the room at meetings like this.
…See more
@darius This is exactly why I don't get people being doom and gloom about the NDA meeting.
Do I trust Meta? hell no. But knowing what they're up to, and being able to do something about it—even if you can't talk about it directly—is valuable AF.
It is precisely because we don't trust them that we need skeptics in the room at meetings like this.
See less
@darius This is exactly why I don't get people being doom and gloom about the NDA meeting.
Do I trust Meta? hell no. But knowing what they're up to, and being able to do something about it—even if you can't talk about it directly—is valuable AF.
It is precisely because we don't trust them that we need skeptics in the room at meetings like this.
@darius This is exactly why I don't get people being doom and gloom about the NDA meeting.
Do I trust Meta? hell no. But knowing what they're up to, and being able to do something about it—even if you can't talk about it directly—is valuable AF.
It is precisely because we don't trust them that we need skeptics in the room at meetings like this.