Simple Social Network

{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

2y ·
Public

·
mastodon.social

Looks part of ongoing lobby, to make open source look a black sheep. I was passed another paper dating back to 2020 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3717031

One of the authors works in the IP and patent law business. https://www.4ipcouncil.com/network/contributors/michele-herman

Keith Whyte

@humanetech @aral @jande @NGIZero @EC_NGI

Trying hard to wrap my head around this one:

"If an SDO’s OSS project becomes fundamental to the way standards are implemented in the marketplace, the lack of participation from these innovators may (i) deprive the community of valuable contributions, and (ii) skew the resulting SDO-approved OSS implementation in a way that is no longer vendor neutral."

I wonder what counts as participation and contribution in the mind of the writer. Only €€€ ?