{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@darius @d3cline

However, if you manage to come up with a simple/unobtrusive solution to the accessibility problem with #5 (as described above), then you could conceivably avoid the confirmation step in #7 as follows:

7a. Filtered list member display -- use the same treatment as #5 here. Essentially you somehow divide the accounts into two subsets: those who are only filtered because of this list vs. those which are also filtered by at least one other list

Hmm ...

1
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Paul Rohr

@darius @d3cline

Without mocking all this up, I'm leaning towards 7a=5a as follows:

5a: Follows -- Add a second (optional) section to the set of accounts, following a "Filtered" subhead

7a. List members -- Add a second (optional) section to the set of accounts, following an "Filtered by other lists" subhead. If this list is toggled to be filtered (at top), then reword subhead to "Also filtered by ..."

Same accessible design works for both cases + degrades to current UX if not needed

1
2y
Replies