{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@cwebber @garbados I was waiting to hear Diana's take on this! What's interesting to me is that her understanding of Spritely Goblins matches my own basically 100% from all the reading I've done. I am just not able to look at the facts of OCAP and extrapolate "what does this give me *that I care about*?" I'm not saying there's nothing there, just that I am unable to make the leap from "what the things does" to "how will this make people's lives better in a way that current technology does not"

2
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Darius Kazemi

@cwebber @garbados To put it another way, Diana says

> If you're still reading, I suspect you're thinking one of two things: "This doesn't make any sense," which I get a lot, or, "What's the catch?"

My thought at that point of the article is rather: "This makes sense! Why should I care?"

3
2y
Hal

@darius @cwebber @garbados

My impression and I encourage everyone to correct me where I'm wrong is it makes implementing fine-grained permission systems way more easily. This means we don't have to throw up our hands and say, "Sorry I can't stop people from replying to you or harassing you in DMs because the protocol has no way to support or enforce that"

0
2y
Replies