{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@gvelez17 you have now run into one of the big problems with the Activity Vocabulary spec. it is very underspecified. so the properties that need to be there are: whatever the software you want to talk to requires 🙃

2
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Golda

@darius haha well it is flexible at least...

But if I want my stuff to be picked up by gath.io, are there clues somewhere? does gath.io want to pick up my events?

1
2y
Golda

@darius @mfoster hey Mark looping you in, i don't think the answer is schema.org - the answer has to be lightweight and a thing that was already adopted - where would you suggest that eithe whatscookin or gath.io (am I saying taht right) should publish our lightweight spec?

1
2y
Replies