@noelrap
While I am personally not a fan of a 3.2 / 3.3 kind of title since it feels like it will become obsolete, I can see why it makes sense.

I would have preferred, perhaps, "Programming Ruby 3" with a sub-title of "Covers Ruby 3.3" so that it sounds relevant for longer.

Delighted that it's almost ready for release!

1
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Noel Rappin

@onghu I get that about the title, we went back and forth about it a bit, but in the end we thought "3.3" was the most descriptive. (Especially, if we, say, do a “3.5" or something in the future).

(I don't always win these discussions -- I was against the version placement in “Rails 4 Test Prescriptions”)

1
1y
Replies