{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@VictorVenema @FrankSonntag @steve @RARohde If you accept these students who don’t yet have publications, then why does it say the opposite in the signup form?

Folks can claim “performative vitriol” if they want, but there’s a very particular narrow demographic of scientist who this particular hoop/gate appeals to. You’re getting feedback from many of the rest (a far more diverse crowd) that find it extremely off-putting and needlessly exclusionary right at the gate. It’s worth asking why.

1
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Dr. Robert Rohde

@icesheetmike @VictorVenema @FrankSonntag @steve

Possibly relevant to this point, a couple weeks ago the account creation page on fediscience was updated to ask for links to publications.

Before that, it was a less specific request to explain why you should be allowed to join a community for academics.

Not sure if the underlying policy actually changed, but asking for links likely makes it seem less welcoming to students and others without publications.

1
2y
Replies