{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@tarkowski @rachelcoldicutt

Many folks here on the made a conscious decision to leave . Or :birdsite: Birdsite, as it is called.

Due to toxicity, harrassment or the vanity culture of influencers or other reasons.

They then don't want to be confronted with cross-posting accounts that effectively bring them to birdsite once again.

1
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Alek

@humanetech @rachelcoldicutt Yes, I get it. Only these are not my “network politics”. I don't understand why a retweet, let's say on climate justice, from Twitter, is not OK just because there's a lot of crappy content on Twitter. But structurally this is very similar to, for example, open source advocates refusing to open .doc files. Again, not my favored approach to socio-technical change, but I get it where this stance comes from. I would approach this as an issue of governance, at best in interconnected systems. I guess my biggest disappointment / issue with Mastodon is how little participatory governance there is. From what I understand key design decisions for the network in some cases have honestly been done based on an individual decision of a key programmer. I wish there was more participatory / community / democratic governance of the Fediverse.

2
2y
Replies