{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}

@darius @d3cline

A note on accessibility. As described, whatever presentation is chosen in #5 can't only be visual. There'd also need to be some other, similarly unobtrusive indicator for visually-impaired users of who's filtered vs. not. Some more obtrusive options include:

5a. Cluster the overall list into sections (regular vs. filtered)

5b. Add some sort of label/icon to only the filtered ones. I'm concerned that this'd be noisy for screen readers though

5c. Something better?

1
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Paul Rohr

@darius @d3cline

However, if you manage to come up with a simple/unobtrusive solution to the accessibility problem with #5 (as described above), then you could conceivably avoid the confirmation step in #7 as follows:

7a. Filtered list member display -- use the same treatment as #5 here. Essentially you somehow divide the accounts into two subsets: those who are only filtered because of this list vs. those which are also filtered by at least one other list

Hmm ...

1
2y
Replies