I’m not an expert when it comes to encryption by any means, but from my work on Sup and my knowledge of the Signal protocol, I’m confident that the lies Elon and Telegram are spreading are unfounded.

You can review the Signal protocol to see for yourself, like they (Elon and them) would be pointing to smoking gun vulnerable code if they had any real dirt, but I’ve yet to see any 😉

9
Share
Share on Mastodon
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin
Frankenfreeman

@dansup Elon’s a counter-indicator.

0
7mo
tard

@dansup
What is it Elon said? Could you provide a source?

0
7mo
Sunshine

@dansup If you're vying/backing up Signal Protocol then I am again at peace that I'm really using a good privacy-conscious messaging app. I couldn't do the audit of the protocol myself, so I am relying on individuals I put my trust with to actually verify it. Thank you very much.

0
7mo
📄 Mehdi.doc

@dansup Elon saying shit about a product means either two things :
- he or someone he knows wants to buy this product's company's stock
- he or someone he knows wants to sell another similar product (or make the other product's company's stock rise)

0
7mo
Patrice

@dansup There are tons of scientific papers on this topic. It is considered the gold standard for a reason. Most recently it showed up in Apple’s iMessage PQ3 papers. (links can be found here: security.apple.com/blog/imessa)

As for Elon: No comment (don’t want to deal with the assholes..)

0
7mo
FifiSch

@dansup Main Signal "vulnerabilities" according to Musk, Durov and Carlson:
1) The company's president is a woman
2) She's vocal about AI inherent risks and biases
3) She supports unions
4) She's not Russian
5) She's a woman.

0
7mo
bery

@dansup Telegram, like, the official team behind telegram? Like they actually did that?

0
7mo
çokderstençıkanışıkfirarda

@dansup yollarda bukurum sebl

0
7mo
Replies