Ricardo Harvin's latest activity
- 2y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.social
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
…See more
See less
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.social
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.social
On NDAs and talking to the enemy
This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal
…See more
See less
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.social
On NDAs and talking to the enemy
This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal
@darius It seemed to me your post was claiming accepting the NDA was *required* in order to know if there was a possible danger approaching, and a warning necessary.
If I misunderstood, I apologize.
…See more
@darius It seemed to me your post was claiming accepting the NDA was *required* in order to know if there was a possible danger approaching, and a warning necessary.
If I misunderstood, I apologize.
See less
@darius It seemed to me your post was claiming accepting the NDA was *required* in order to know if there was a possible danger approaching, and a warning necessary.
If I misunderstood, I apologize.
@darius It seemed to me your post was claiming accepting the NDA was *required* in order to know if there was a possible danger approaching, and a warning necessary.
If I misunderstood, I apologize.
…See more
See less
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.social
On NDAs and talking to the enemy
This content was marked as sensitive. Click to reveal
@darius When BigCorp insists on an NDA, that's enough to warrant a public warning of possible impending harm.
Any entity wanting to privately discuss, under penalty of legal harm, any matter regarding participation with a network that explicitly functions under a principle of complete openness and transparency should always be met first and foremost with suspicion and concern for harms they may commit, intentional or not.
You understand that, surely.
…See more
@darius When BigCorp insists on an NDA, that's enough to warrant a public warning of possible impending harm.
Any entity wanting to privately discuss, under penalty of legal harm, any matter regarding participation with a network that explicitly functions under a principle of complete openness and transparency should always be met first and foremost with suspicion and concern for harms they may commit, intentional or not.
You understand that, surely.
See less
@darius When BigCorp insists on an NDA, that's enough to warrant a public warning of possible impending harm.
Any entity wanting to privately discuss, under penalty of legal harm, any matter regarding participation with a network that explicitly functions under a principle of complete openness and transparency should always be met first and foremost with suspicion and concern for harms they may commit, intentional or not.
You understand that, surely.
@darius When BigCorp insists on an NDA, that's enough to warrant a public warning of possible impending harm.
Any entity wanting to privately discuss, under penalty of legal harm, any matter regarding participation with a network that explicitly functions under a principle of complete openness and transparency should always be met first and foremost with suspicion and concern for harms they may commit, intentional or not.
You understand that, surely.
…See more
See less
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mstdn.social