ITX Mike's latest activity
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@Gargron We need to find a way for smaller/newer instances to verify a certain baseline of rules and capacity to get promoted/seen and help shoulder the load. ~65 instances shouldn't be expected to handle it all.
…See more
@Gargron We need to find a way for smaller/newer instances to verify a certain baseline of rules and capacity to get promoted/seen and help shoulder the load. ~65 instances shouldn't be expected to handle it all.
See less
@Gargron We need to find a way for smaller/newer instances to verify a certain baseline of rules and capacity to get promoted/seen and help shoulder the load. ~65 instances shouldn't be expected to handle it all.
@Gargron We need to find a way for smaller/newer instances to verify a certain baseline of rules and capacity to get promoted/seen and help shoulder the load. ~65 instances shouldn't be expected to handle it all.