Lea's latest activity
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@Gargron
I'm against it. But if you do it please consider these controls:
1) users must be able to disallow quoting on all their posts or on a per-post basis.
2) If someone quote-toots you, you must get a notification of it, and
3) If it's abusive or you don't like what they did with your post, you can opt to "block" the quote, meaning: the quote no longer appears in their post, and their post is no longer linked to you or your post; your post can no longer be reached from there.
…See more
@Gargron
I'm against it. But if you do it please consider these controls:
1) users must be able to disallow quoting on all their posts or on a per-post basis.
2) If someone quote-toots you, you must get a notification of it, and
3) If it's abusive or you don't like what they did with your post, you can opt to "block" the quote, meaning: the quote no longer appears in their post, and their post is no longer linked to you or your post; your post can no longer be reached from there.
See less
@Gargron
I'm against it. But if you do it please consider these controls:
1) users must be able to disallow quoting on all their posts or on a per-post basis.
2) If someone quote-toots you, you must get a notification of it, and
3) If it's abusive or you don't like what they did with your post, you can opt to "block" the quote, meaning: the quote no longer appears in their post, and their post is no longer linked to you or your post; your post can no longer be reached from there.
@Gargron
I'm against it. But if you do it please consider these controls:
1) users must be able to disallow quoting on all their posts or on a per-post basis.
2) If someone quote-toots you, you must get a notification of it, and
3) If it's abusive or you don't like what they did with your post, you can opt to "block" the quote, meaning: the quote no longer appears in their post, and their post is no longer linked to you or your post; your post can no longer be reached from there.
Lea deleted
over 1 year{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@Gargron I think it would be a mistake (for reasons you already know to be valid), but if you do it, we need to be able to set QuoteToot/Boost preferences like:
QTs of my posts are:
a) never allowed (default)
b) always allowed
c) must be approved by me each time (getting a QT request similar to a Follow request)
Should there also be an instance-wide setting for Admins to prevent QTs of their members?
Most new users demanding QTs didn't even try to give the "Mastodon way" a chance first.
…See more
@Gargron I think it would be a mistake (for reasons you already know to be valid), but if you do it, we need to be able to set QuoteToot/Boost preferences like:
QTs of my posts are:
a) never allowed (default)
b) always allowed
c) must be approved by me each time (getting a QT request similar to a Follow request)
Should there also be an instance-wide setting for Admins to prevent QTs of their members?
Most new users demanding QTs didn't even try to give the "Mastodon way" a chance first.
See less
@Gargron I think it would be a mistake (for reasons you already know to be valid), but if you do it, we need to be able to set QuoteToot/Boost preferences like:
QTs of my posts are:
a) never allowed (default)
b) always allowed
c) must be approved by me each time (getting a QT request similar to a Follow request)
Should there also be an instance-wide setting for Admins to prevent QTs of their members?
Most new users demanding QTs didn't even try to give the "Mastodon way" a chance first.
@Gargron I think it would be a mistake (for reasons you already know to be valid), but if you do it, we need to be able to set QuoteToot/Boost preferences like:
QTs of my posts are:
a) never allowed (default)
b) always allowed
c) must be approved by me each time (getting a QT request similar to a Follow request)
Should there also be an instance-wide setting for Admins to prevent QTs of their members?
Most new users demanding QTs didn't even try to give the "Mastodon way" a chance first.