Kasperaliteten's latest activity
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@darius Nice work. That's a really interesting approach to event sharing!
I recently realized that Mastodon are not planning to implement the "Event" activity, and I thought about making a "hack" where sharing events from another site would present it as a "Question" activity with replies "Going" and "Not going" to those that subscribe to the channel.
What are the reasons behind choosing to make a separate profile for each event instead? And wouldn't this be harder to share on other platforms? E.g. the event would "invite" users by sending them a follow request... but are there any ways to actually share an "event user", if you are not a moderator of it?
There are probably holes in my own suggestion as well. I was just wondering what the philosophy was behind this design?
…See more
@darius Nice work. That's a really interesting approach to event sharing!
I recently realized that Mastodon are not planning to implement the "Event" activity, and I thought about making a "hack" where sharing events from another site would present it as a "Question" activity with replies "Going" and "Not going" to those that subscribe to the channel.
What are the reasons behind choosing to make a separate profile for each event instead? And wouldn't this be harder to share on other platforms? E.g. the event would "invite" users by sending them a follow request... but are there any ways to actually share an "event user", if you are not a moderator of it?
There are probably holes in my own suggestion as well. I was just wondering what the philosophy was behind this design?
See less
@darius Nice work. That's a really interesting approach to event sharing!
I recently realized that Mastodon are not planning to implement the "Event" activity, and I thought about making a "hack" where sharing events from another site would present it as a "Question" activity with replies "Going" and "Not going" to those that subscribe to the channel.
What are the reasons behind choosing to make a separate profile for each event instead? And wouldn't this be harder to share on other platforms? E.g. the event would "invite" users by sending them a follow request... but are there any ways to actually share an "event user", if you are not a moderator of it?
There are probably holes in my own suggestion as well. I was just wondering what the philosophy was behind this design?
@darius Nice work. That's a really interesting approach to event sharing!
I recently realized that Mastodon are not planning to implement the "Event" activity, and I thought about making a "hack" where sharing events from another site would present it as a "Question" activity with replies "Going" and "Not going" to those that subscribe to the channel.
What are the reasons behind choosing to make a separate profile for each event instead? And wouldn't this be harder to share on other platforms? E.g. the event would "invite" users by sending them a follow request... but are there any ways to actually share an "event user", if you are not a moderator of it?
There are probably holes in my own suggestion as well. I was just wondering what the philosophy was behind this design?