innerand's latest activity
- 2y ·
-
Public·
-
chaos.social
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@Gargron Think about an expert, maybe a medical doctor who writes about the results of a study she made.
You know, she has no interest on getting my opinion on that (a reply) as I have nothing to contribute here. It would just be spam to her.
BUT I would like to discuss her results with my audience -> Perfectly valid use case for quoted toots.
You shouldn't take this feature from as just because it also can be used for no good.
…See more
@Gargron Think about an expert, maybe a medical doctor who writes about the results of a study she made.
You know, she has no interest on getting my opinion on that (a reply) as I have nothing to contribute here. It would just be spam to her.
BUT I would like to discuss her results with my audience -> Perfectly valid use case for quoted toots.
You shouldn't take this feature from as just because it also can be used for no good.
See less
@Gargron Think about an expert, maybe a medical doctor who writes about the results of a study she made.
You know, she has no interest on getting my opinion on that (a reply) as I have nothing to contribute here. It would just be spam to her.
BUT I would like to discuss her results with my audience -> Perfectly valid use case for quoted toots.
You shouldn't take this feature from as just because it also can be used for no good.
@Gargron Think about an expert, maybe a medical doctor who writes about the results of a study she made.
You know, she has no interest on getting my opinion on that (a reply) as I have nothing to contribute here. It would just be spam to her.
BUT I would like to discuss her results with my audience -> Perfectly valid use case for quoted toots.
You shouldn't take this feature from as just because it also can be used for no good.