洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)'s latest activity
- 10d ·
-
Public·
-
fosstodon.org
“When you don't create things, you become defined by your tastes rather than your ability. Your tastes only narrow & exclude people. So create.”
—why the lucky stiff
…See more
“When you don't create things, you become defined by your tastes rather than your ability. Your tastes only narrow & exclude people. So create.”
—why the lucky stiff
See less
“When you don't create things, you become defined by your tastes rather than your ability. Your tastes only narrow & exclude people. So create.”
—why the lucky stiff
“When you don't create things, you become defined by your tastes rather than your ability. Your tastes only narrow & exclude people. So create.”
—why the lucky stiff
- 3mo ·
-
Public·
-
fosstodon.org
I've rewritten #Fedify several times and in several languages. The first time it was written in #TypeScript, then #Python, then C#, then back to TypeScript. (It was codenamed FediKit at the time of development.) I settled on TypeScript for the following reasons:
• It has a decent JSON-LD implementation.
• Lots of people use it. (I wanted Fedify to be widely used.)
• It's type-safe enough.
Even if I were to build Fedify again, I would choose TypeScript.
…See more
I've rewritten #Fedify several times and in several languages. The first time it was written in #TypeScript, then #Python, then C#, then back to TypeScript. (It was codenamed FediKit at the time of development.) I settled on TypeScript for the following reasons:
• It has a decent JSON-LD implementation.
• Lots of people use it. (I wanted Fedify to be widely used.)
• It's type-safe enough.
Even if I were to build Fedify again, I would choose TypeScript.
See less
I've rewritten #Fedify several times and in several languages. The first time it was written in #TypeScript, then #Python, then C#, then back to TypeScript. (It was codenamed FediKit at the time of development.) I settled on TypeScript for the following reasons:
• It has a decent JSON-LD implementation.
• Lots of people use it. (I wanted Fedify to be widely used.)
• It's type-safe enough.
Even if I were to build Fedify again, I would choose TypeScript.
I've rewritten #Fedify several times and in several languages. The first time it was written in #TypeScript, then #Python, then C#, then back to TypeScript. (It was codenamed FediKit at the time of development.) I settled on TypeScript for the following reasons:
• It has a decent JSON-LD implementation.
• Lots of people use it. (I wanted Fedify to be widely used.)
• It's type-safe enough.
Even if I were to build Fedify again, I would choose TypeScript.