Woefdram's latest activity
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
procolix.social
@dansup @jelv Collaboration and sharing is -in the long term- better for everyone.
In that light I just have to point everybody at this classic work again, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, by Eric S. Raymond.
https://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/
(yup, he screwed up his certificate, but alright...)
I bought a paper version years ago, because I prefer reading paper, but you can read it online too. Completely free, of course.
…See more
@dansup @jelv Collaboration and sharing is -in the long term- better for everyone.
In that light I just have to point everybody at this classic work again, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, by Eric S. Raymond.
https://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/
(yup, he screwed up his certificate, but alright...)
I bought a paper version years ago, because I prefer reading paper, but you can read it online too. Completely free, of course.
See less
@dansup @jelv Collaboration and sharing is -in the long term- better for everyone.
In that light I just have to point everybody at this classic work again, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, by Eric S. Raymond.
https://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/
(yup, he screwed up his certificate, but alright...)
I bought a paper version years ago, because I prefer reading paper, but you can read it online too. Completely free, of course.
@dansup @jelv Collaboration and sharing is -in the long term- better for everyone.
In that light I just have to point everybody at this classic work again, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, by Eric S. Raymond.
https://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/
(yup, he screwed up his certificate, but alright...)
I bought a paper version years ago, because I prefer reading paper, but you can read it online too. Completely free, of course.
…See more
See less
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
procolix.social
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@Gargron Well, yes and no.
Maybe I'm still thinking too much about the embrace-extend-extinguish tactics of Micro$oft in the past, but I really don't expect Fac^H^H^HMeta to have seen the light and all of a sudden give the people something useful that they don't control.
There has to be some plan behind it to monetize it. Which -in itself- isn't wrong, but they're only in it for the money, everything else is secondary.
I don't trust Suckerberg. At all.
…See more
@Gargron Well, yes and no.
Maybe I'm still thinking too much about the embrace-extend-extinguish tactics of Micro$oft in the past, but I really don't expect Fac^H^H^HMeta to have seen the light and all of a sudden give the people something useful that they don't control.
There has to be some plan behind it to monetize it. Which -in itself- isn't wrong, but they're only in it for the money, everything else is secondary.
I don't trust Suckerberg. At all.
See less
@Gargron Well, yes and no.
Maybe I'm still thinking too much about the embrace-extend-extinguish tactics of Micro$oft in the past, but I really don't expect Fac^H^H^HMeta to have seen the light and all of a sudden give the people something useful that they don't control.
There has to be some plan behind it to monetize it. Which -in itself- isn't wrong, but they're only in it for the money, everything else is secondary.
I don't trust Suckerberg. At all.
@Gargron Well, yes and no.
Maybe I'm still thinking too much about the embrace-extend-extinguish tactics of Micro$oft in the past, but I really don't expect Fac^H^H^HMeta to have seen the light and all of a sudden give the people something useful that they don't control.
There has to be some plan behind it to monetize it. Which -in itself- isn't wrong, but they're only in it for the money, everything else is secondary.
I don't trust Suckerberg. At all.