Alan Miller :verified_paw:'s latest activity
@TerribleMaps it's been a long time since I looked at it, but the "smart pen" options with proprietary paper (looks gray, actually a printed grid) used a grid with a fixed maximum size something like this. Different areas of pattern were allocated to different organizations.
Remembered while writing: Anoto.
…See more
@TerribleMaps it's been a long time since I looked at it, but the "smart pen" options with proprietary paper (looks gray, actually a printed grid) used a grid with a fixed maximum size something like this. Different areas of pattern were allocated to different organizations.
Remembered while writing: Anoto.
See less
@TerribleMaps it's been a long time since I looked at it, but the "smart pen" options with proprietary paper (looks gray, actually a printed grid) used a grid with a fixed maximum size something like this. Different areas of pattern were allocated to different organizations.
Remembered while writing: Anoto.
@TerribleMaps it's been a long time since I looked at it, but the "smart pen" options with proprietary paper (looks gray, actually a printed grid) used a grid with a fixed maximum size something like this. Different areas of pattern were allocated to different organizations.
Remembered while writing: Anoto.
…See more
See less
@dansup perhaps some kind of instance reputation? Been in use for years for mail servers so a lot of problems have likely been addressed already.
…See more
@dansup perhaps some kind of instance reputation? Been in use for years for mail servers so a lot of problems have likely been addressed already.
See less
@dansup perhaps some kind of instance reputation? Been in use for years for mail servers so a lot of problems have likely been addressed already.
@dansup perhaps some kind of instance reputation? Been in use for years for mail servers so a lot of problems have likely been addressed already.
…See more
See less
@dansup if you're doing this, maybe don't call it just "Delete" - call it "Suspend then Delete" so there's never confusion.
Might also make it multi stage - states of 'suspended pending delete', 'lazy delete' during which content can be actually removed in the backend as convenient, 'deleted' with all identifiable data removed but possibly internal IDs remain as placeholders for consistency checks if needed.
…See more
@dansup if you're doing this, maybe don't call it just "Delete" - call it "Suspend then Delete" so there's never confusion.
Might also make it multi stage - states of 'suspended pending delete', 'lazy delete' during which content can be actually removed in the backend as convenient, 'deleted' with all identifiable data removed but possibly internal IDs remain as placeholders for consistency checks if needed.
See less
@dansup if you're doing this, maybe don't call it just "Delete" - call it "Suspend then Delete" so there's never confusion.
Might also make it multi stage - states of 'suspended pending delete', 'lazy delete' during which content can be actually removed in the backend as convenient, 'deleted' with all identifiable data removed but possibly internal IDs remain as placeholders for consistency checks if needed.
@dansup if you're doing this, maybe don't call it just "Delete" - call it "Suspend then Delete" so there's never confusion.
Might also make it multi stage - states of 'suspended pending delete', 'lazy delete' during which content can be actually removed in the backend as convenient, 'deleted' with all identifiable data removed but possibly internal IDs remain as placeholders for consistency checks if needed.