Shachihoko's latest activity
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mastodon.social
So if I parsed the blog post right:
- Meta can only get my public profile and posts
- No ads, unless my server implements them (they shouldn't)
- The danger of embrace/extend/extinguish is essentially nil
- Meta isn't going to gain undue influence over the rest of the Fediverse due to Threads, even after (if) they federate
I would say I'm okay with this. I might still block the domain, but I'm not going to worry about that too much at the moment.
…See more
So if I parsed the blog post right:
- Meta can only get my public profile and posts
- No ads, unless my server implements them (they shouldn't)
- The danger of embrace/extend/extinguish is essentially nil
- Meta isn't going to gain undue influence over the rest of the Fediverse due to Threads, even after (if) they federate
I would say I'm okay with this. I might still block the domain, but I'm not going to worry about that too much at the moment.
See less
So if I parsed the blog post right:
- Meta can only get my public profile and posts
- No ads, unless my server implements them (they shouldn't)
- The danger of embrace/extend/extinguish is essentially nil
- Meta isn't going to gain undue influence over the rest of the Fediverse due to Threads, even after (if) they federate
I would say I'm okay with this. I might still block the domain, but I'm not going to worry about that too much at the moment.
So if I parsed the blog post right:
- Meta can only get my public profile and posts
- No ads, unless my server implements them (they shouldn't)
- The danger of embrace/extend/extinguish is essentially nil
- Meta isn't going to gain undue influence over the rest of the Fediverse due to Threads, even after (if) they federate
I would say I'm okay with this. I might still block the domain, but I'm not going to worry about that too much at the moment.
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mastodon.social
The security-risk angle of link shorteners hadn't even occured to me, but I'm glad to see confirmation like this that they're NOT necessary. Thank you for posting this up!
…See more
The security-risk angle of link shorteners hadn't even occured to me, but I'm glad to see confirmation like this that they're NOT necessary. Thank you for posting this up!
See less
The security-risk angle of link shorteners hadn't even occured to me, but I'm glad to see confirmation like this that they're NOT necessary. Thank you for posting this up!
The security-risk angle of link shorteners hadn't even occured to me, but I'm glad to see confirmation like this that they're NOT necessary. Thank you for posting this up!
…See more
See less
- 1y ·
-
Public·
-
mastodon.social