Deuchnord Sans MS's latest activity
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
{"p":"","h":{"iv":"ROXSYW+cfvEbFHu5","at":"ocxplSQjdRC3tXEtB/9/wg=="}}
@dansup how would it work with ActivityPub? 🤔
…See more
@dansup how would it work with ActivityPub? 🤔
See less
@dansup how would it work with ActivityPub? 🤔
@dansup how would it work with ActivityPub? 🤔
…See more
See less
@LaQuadrature y'a une toute pitite typo dans les tags, vous avez mis "symphony", mais le framework s'écrit "Symfony" (sinon, vous parlez soit de Beethoven, soit d'un CMS :D)
…See more
@LaQuadrature y'a une toute pitite typo dans les tags, vous avez mis "symphony", mais le framework s'écrit "Symfony" (sinon, vous parlez soit de Beethoven, soit d'un CMS :D)
See less
@LaQuadrature y'a une toute pitite typo dans les tags, vous avez mis "symphony", mais le framework s'écrit "Symfony" (sinon, vous parlez soit de Beethoven, soit d'un CMS :D)
@LaQuadrature y'a une toute pitite typo dans les tags, vous avez mis "symphony", mais le framework s'écrit "Symfony" (sinon, vous parlez soit de Beethoven, soit d'un CMS :D)
…See more
See less
@dansup it would be great if those dev tools would be usable locally, so we can test our devs without having to use apps like Ngrok.
And a CLI version would allow an integration to the CI :)
…See more
@dansup it would be great if those dev tools would be usable locally, so we can test our devs without having to use apps like Ngrok.
And a CLI version would allow an integration to the CI :)
See less
@dansup it would be great if those dev tools would be usable locally, so we can test our devs without having to use apps like Ngrok.
And a CLI version would allow an integration to the CI :)
@dansup it would be great if those dev tools would be usable locally, so we can test our devs without having to use apps like Ngrok.
And a CLI version would allow an integration to the CI :)
…See more
See less
@dansup the real problem here is that if you want your API to really be compatible with the whole Fediverse, you must copy Mastodon’s implementation, which does not follow the ActivityPub perfectly.
…See more
@dansup the real problem here is that if you want your API to really be compatible with the whole Fediverse, you must copy Mastodon’s implementation, which does not follow the ActivityPub perfectly.
See less
@dansup the real problem here is that if you want your API to really be compatible with the whole Fediverse, you must copy Mastodon’s implementation, which does not follow the ActivityPub perfectly.
@dansup the real problem here is that if you want your API to really be compatible with the whole Fediverse, you must copy Mastodon’s implementation, which does not follow the ActivityPub perfectly.
…See more
See less
…See more
See less
@dansup I'm curious, how does the website detect the software the server executes?
I see that my website (deuchnord.fr) is detected, which is normal because I have integrated ActivityPub on the blog, but the software I use for that (a free software I have created) is not specified.
…See more
@dansup I'm curious, how does the website detect the software the server executes?
I see that my website (deuchnord.fr) is detected, which is normal because I have integrated ActivityPub on the blog, but the software I use for that (a free software I have created) is not specified.
See less
@dansup I'm curious, how does the website detect the software the server executes?
I see that my website (deuchnord.fr) is detected, which is normal because I have integrated ActivityPub on the blog, but the software I use for that (a free software I have created) is not specified.
@dansup I'm curious, how does the website detect the software the server executes?
I see that my website (deuchnord.fr) is detected, which is normal because I have integrated ActivityPub on the blog, but the software I use for that (a free software I have created) is not specified.